Gamma and Delta and Peripheral Figures.

Here I speak of Gamma Timeline VS Delta Timeline, observing a few points that run contrary to the official narrative.

First, Delta Timeline is highjacked construction, a perversion of what was once a set of hopeful objectives, but these were taken over and basically painted by popular culture, until what we have is a circulating set of invective, caustic statements used by people who communicate professionally.

The end game there is said to be Planetary Destruction, however, this is more of the "something borrowed" where an objective was changed.  Would it entirely flatten you to know that the Delta Timeline was once a roadmap to peace?

At first it was buried in a myriad of laughter, then people fought to carve out their own interpretations, as if they were "corporate shareholders" of that particular theory, and somewhere in the process of all that mass replication, came the end game that was always there but looking for its own excuse:  Planetary Annihilation.

It was like a car insurance company looking for a good ad campaign, those people, searching out something they could use, as if in some sort of diabolical sports contest, team pitted against team, adversaries by the style of shirt, and in the end, they all agreed that they had their excuse, sort of a poster child that they could look to.

In my own section, the above applies, but then also, Gamma Timeline is a fabrication that caught on for seemingly no ecumenical or providential reason of its own conniving, but simply out of a sense of fashion, running sort of the opposite stripe of the Delta process.

Make no mistake, there are concealed intentions behind Gamma Timeline, as if from the red mist of the last decade, that clouded everything, obscuring so much, rounding the rough edges.

The key to the whole misunderstanding, or the rectification of the misunderstanding, which would bring about a new widespread illumination, indeed, that key may be the true facts of the Archon debacle of 1996.  And as we know, the victor is always the one that writes the histories, but here a free pen has been taken to ALREADY PUBLISHED reports, as if editing the true account to be cast under some new cloud, dictated largely by some other agenda by peripheral figures.

Such as, editors at Tileo's Granary, not knowing the story, making some kind of laughable joke premise of the whole thing, essentially making the ruined lives of those who suffered in the whole thing MERE JOKES.  But those were the sources that were enlisted after initial accounts, as "any port in a storm", fonts of information, for certain, but nothing pertinent to the published account.  Nevertheless that material was grafted onto the official account, and for what purpose one cannot know, but a nefarious aspect is assumed, with the most nefarious aspect of all in the matter being a prevailing thirst for any kind of information, whether the data points were properly vetted or not.